In her essay "Disability," Nancy Mairs constructs
a maze from preconceived notions all the way to her thesis. Each concept she
presents acts as a fork which must be interpreted the right way otherwise it
will lead to a dead end that forces some backtracking to get back to the true point
of her essay. Mairs opens with a description of herself as "crippled with
multiple sclerosis" and "easy to spot in even in a crowd"
because of her "peculiar gait." This description can be said to
appeal for sympathy. However, Mairs is really trying to establish her ethos to
discuss disability in general. This is apparent in her use of the blunt word "peculiar"
with its negative connotations to describe herself. Also, Mairs’s criticism of
the medical drama must be seen to derive from the character of “Ms. MS” rather
than her actions. The real issue she has is that there is no depiction of the able
side of the woman with MS even though it is there. Mairs reveals it is there
with her catalogue of her activities as “Ms. Great American Consumer” because
she “drive[s] a car,” “eat[s] pizza,” and “menstruate[s]” which hints at the true criticism through an association of basic, ordinary activities and disability. By following the correct interpretations, Mairs’s thesis
can be realized. The media’s lack of reality regarding disability imperils the
temporarily able bodied as well as alienates the disabled.
Awesome analysis, Leo! I never thought about the different ways that Mair's piece can be interpreted. I liked how you really used specific evidence from the piece to your advantage.
ReplyDelete